On 12/15/06, Christian Ebert <blacktrash at gmx.net> wrote: > > This lets it pass tests on 2.5 for me. > > Same here, except for test-parse-date (expected due to broken > locale on MacOS X) and test-hup (which is unrelated to this). > Can you find out what is the difference between your 'ls -R' and the expected output ? thanks, Benoit