[RFC] convert-repo enhancements
Brendan Cully
brendan at kublai.com
Mon Feb 26 18:57:12 UTC 2007
On Saturday, 24 February 2007 at 16:23, Edouard Gomez wrote:
> Brendan Cully (brendan at kublai.com) wrote:
> > > 07 - Enh - Always add tags the same branch
> >
> > I think it might be nicer if tags go onto the same branch that they
> > tag. I noticed while pulling apart my converted mutt repository that
> > if I cloned -r <stable branch>, I ended up with a repository that had
> > no tag info at all. I would rather it had the tags applied to stable.
>
> I'm ok with your argument, it'd be good if clone -r <branch> had its
> tags somewhere. But i am not so sure that it's good to disturb original
> history with tag nodes.
>
> Is there a way to have tags aside the branch and clone -r getting that
> tags ?
No, I don't think so. By the way, along those lines I think it might
be a bit nicer if tag commits were inlined in the history as they were
discovered, rather than being applied at the end of the round. You'd
get a more repeatable conversion that way too.
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list