[PATCH 3 of 5] Add option to heads to show only heads for current branch

[Joel Rosdahl]

Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas at intevation.de> writes:

> * Joel Rosdahl <joel at rosdahl.net> [20070606 22:25]:

>> I don't think a dot for working copy revision works very well in
>> ASCII art; it's too invisible. I chose @ because it can be
>> pronounced "at" ("this is the revision you're at"). If it needs
>> changing, I'd rather change it to some other distinct character,
>> e.g., X (like on a map: "you are here ---> X").
>
> I have already changed it and it looks quite good with the fonts I
> tried. There is something like an empty space, but at least I looked
> at it for this reason while I never noticed the @ before.
>
> X looks good, too, but I think we should wait for more feedback.

Now I've used the dot variant for a (short) while and I still don't
like it. The primary reason is that it doesn't look like a node but
just like the end of an edge.

(And I don't really see why the node character has to correlate with
revision specifiers.)

Any other opinions?

-- 
Regards,
Joel Rosdahl <joel at rosdahl.net>
Key BB845E97; fingerprint 9F4B D780 6EF4 5700 778D  8B22 0064 F9FF BB84 5E97