[PATCH V3] revset: add "matching" keyword

[Matt Mackall]

On Tue, 2012-04-10 at 01:02 +0200, Angel Ezquerra wrote:

> There is still the matter of whether it is ok to say that the fields
> are matched in alphabetical order, which could cause backwards
> compatibility issues if new fields are added in the future.

I think this should be as much like sort as possible, which means no
prefix matching.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.