[PATCH] annotate: added --message/-m option to list the commit message (issue3117)
Matt Mackall
mpm at selenic.com
Tue Feb 14 18:36:23 UTC 2012
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 11:00 +0100, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:58:15AM +0100, Jesús Espino wrote:
> > 2012/2/14 Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at logilab.fr>:
> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 03:49:33PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 16:59 +0100, Jesús Espino wrote:
> > >> > # HG changeset patch
> > >> > # User Jesus Espino Garcia <jesus.espino at kaleidos.net>
> > >> > # Date 1329062320 -3600
> > >> > # Node ID c86ea5f3221f2c1d3313b7013a6e41d0254e492c
> > >> > # Parent cb756482c1aad808add481a6967e2eb7a5aead21
> > >> > annotate: added --message/-m option to list the commit message (issue3117)
> > >>
> > >> Seems like it will be disastrously ugly with all but the shortest commit
> > >> messages?
> > >
> > > Adding a generic --template argument will allow people do to any kind of
> > > crazyness without adding to much option to annotate.
> >
> > This is another interesting approach, i will try to implement it, but
> > anyway i think the -m option is enough common to include it in the
> > annotate command directly.
>
> I'm not convinced this is a common requirement (on the command line). What do
> other people think about this ?
I've heard it exactly once. I don't think this feature meets the utility
threshold. Once we have generic templating, this feature will be more
readily available without adding extra interface cruft.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list