[PATCH RFC/WIP] introduce stash command
v
voldermort at hotmail.com
Fri Jun 29 12:23:35 UTC 2012
Idan Kamara wrote
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:37 PM, v <voldermort@> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sean Farley wrote
>> >
>> >> You can only use MQ as a stash if you're not working with MQ.
>> >> Otherwise,
>> >> the
>> >> stash patch will keep getting in the way of the patches that you're
>> >> working
>> >> on.
>> >
>> > hg help qqueue
>> >
>>
>> I'm in the middle of a patch queue (i.e. some patches applied), and need
>> to
>> stash away the working directory. How can this be done with a different
>> queue?
>
> In that case you can `hg qnew stash && hg qpop` and later
> on `hg qpush --move stash`.
>
Not if I want to push the next patch in the queue without unstashing - then
I have to change the order of the patch series first. It's /possible/ to use
mq as a stash, but it can be a messy pain, because mq is the wrong tool for
temporarily stashing away uncommitted changes.
--
View this message in context: http://mercurial.808500.n3.nabble.com/PATCH-RFC-WIP-introduce-stash-command-tp3988194p3990020.html
Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list