[PATCH] unionrepo: read-only operations on a union of two localrepos

[Mads Kiilerich]

On 04/15/2013 11:24 AM, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:04:25AM +0200, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
>> On 04/15/2013 02:28 AM, Matt Mackall wrote:
>>> I suspect this needs patching up to be fully correct with obsolete
>>> markers. So we'll consider this experimental for now. Will eventually
>>> need docs.
>> Yes, I guess so. The missing support for obsolete and the missing
>> public documentation are both inherited from bundlerepo, and both
>> kinds of repo bastards will thus share the same destiny.
> except that bundle does not hold any obsolescences marker or phase information.
> making it merge easier to merge those no data with the base repo.

Are you saying that bundlerepo already is handling it correctly, or that 
it would be easier to fix bundlerepo than to fix unionrepo?

/Mads