[PATCH 2 of 3 RFC] obsolete: allow passing a revision to successorssets()
Augie Fackler
lists at durin42.com
Fri Aug 16 01:16:14 UTC 2013
On Aug 15, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
>
> On 16 août 2013, at 02:39, Augie Fackler wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Pierre-Yves David
>> <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8 août 2013, at 09:48, Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen wrote:
>>>
>>>> # HG changeset patch
>>>> # User Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen <danchr at gmail.com>
>>>> # Date 1375616619 -7200
>>>> # Sun Aug 04 13:43:39 2013 +0200
>>>> # Node ID b1f7ae28c3e371a70ee363a4fbe5d50063a224fc
>>>> # Parent 02c24ad6f4d2d954da11d128280978e25aaa48fd
>>>> obsolete: allow passing a revision to successorssets()
>>>
>>> Why do you need this.
>>
>>
>> Because with troubled divergent changes, there's _no other way_ to
>> figure out what the divergence is.
>
> Knowing the successors set if a useful feature. but why do you need this very internal function to takes revision?
Huh, okay. Marmoute convinced me I'm just insane. Dropping this for now.
>
>> I lost 30 minutes screwing around in a REPL to figure this out once, and this revset would have been a godsend.
>
> (note: Until then you can use the debugsuccessorsset command)
>
> revset ? successorsset return a list of tuple. how do you plan to use that usefully in a revset ?
>
> if evolve doesn't already provide a revset for all successors, that a shame a can be quickly fixed.
>
> --
> Pierre-Yves
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list