Not sure I trust patchwork yet

[Matt Mackall]

On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 09:11 +0100, Thomas Arendsen Hein wrote:
> * Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> [20130117 08:18]:
> > > On Wednesday, 16 January 2013 at 23:35, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > > http://markmail.org/message/2asd5fg73v5bqgzb
> > > > http://markmail.org/message/kt56kjokj2lg7av6
> > > > 
> > > > These two patches do not appear to be anywhere on patchwork.
> > 
> > There are at least 20 patches in my inbox that patchwork denies all
> > knowledge of. Most of them appear to be since Christmas. Here's another
> > one:
> > 
> > Subject: [PATCH 4 of 4 V3-Series-A] hidden: drop of the repo.hiddenrevs
> > http://markmail.org/message/pas5bdceuwce5qxr
> 
> These three patches are in "diff --git" format, maybe this confuses
> patchwork?

An interesting theory, but a resend of the second patch shows up here in
git format:

 http://patchwork.serpentine.com/patch/629/

Patchwork comes from the gitlandia, so we'd expect it to know about git
patches.

Also, the patch linked at the top actually is in patchwork, but you have
to enable "all states" and "archived" patches in the search to find it.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.