[PATCH RFC] incoming: show changed bookmarks in addition to new ones
Yuya Nishihara
yuya at tcha.org
Thu Feb 12 15:11:36 UTC 2015
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:03:11 -0800, Sean Farley wrote:
> Ryan McElroy writes:
> > On 2/11/2015 6:44 AM, Augie Fackler wrote:
> >> On Feb 11, 2015, at 6:57 AM, FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy at lares.dti.ne.jp> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Once I posted the series to show detail about bookmarks at
> >>> incoming/outgoing (refreshing them for current tip of hg repo is
> >>> queued in my own TODO list :-))
> >>>
> >>> http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2013-November/054580.html
> >>> http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2013-November/054582.html
> >>>
> >>> How about showing in this style ?
> >> I agree that bookmarks incoming is currently somewhat broken (I'm shocked it doesn't mention moves!). It'd be nice to use foozy's proposed format if possible, but I'm not sure if that is okay within our BC policies. We'll probably need to revisit this in a couple of weeks when I can consult mpm.
> >>
> > I definitely like that proposed more verbose style better. I think
> > waiting for mpm makes sense, I wanted to get this out for comment while
> > I remembered it though.
>
> Yeah, it's really slick.
I like that, but it seems the last column, "advanced remotely", etc., is too
verbose compared to other parsable commands.
> > One thought would be to have hg incoming -B -v give this format:
> > http://selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2013-November/054580.html
> >
> > What hg incoming -B gives the more "compatible" format listed here?
> > Would that solve most BC issues?
>
> I might incur the wrath of mpm but I honestly think there is nothing
> worth keeping about the current output.
There's a patch for thg that parses the output of incoming/outgoing -B.
I hope the new format will be enabled by -v.
Regards,
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list