D7121: copies: get copies information directly from _copies

[martinvonz (Martin von Zweigbergk)]

martinvonz added a comment.


  In D7121#104673 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121#104673>, @marmoute wrote:
  
  > In D7121#104672 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121#104672>, @martinvonz wrote:
  >
  >> In D7121#104671 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121#104671>, @marmoute wrote:
  >>
  >>> In D7121#104546 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121#104546>, @martinvonz wrote:
  >>>
  >>>>> […]
  >>>>
  >>>> So there seems to be a measurable difference. Could just the function call overhead be that whole difference? Anyway, it doesn't seem worth spending time trying to figure out.
  >>>
  >>> Function call can have a large overhead, how many revision are we talking about here ?
  >>
  >> 5627
  >
  > That is not much to be honest. How do you measure this?
  
  By running exactly the command I shared earlier :P This is a version of mozilla-unified I've created by running `hg convert --config experimental.copies.write-to=changeset-only`.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121/new/

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7121

To: marmoute, #hg-reviewers, martinvonz
Cc: martinvonz, mercurial-devel