Testing an RC of evolve 11.0.0 and topic 1.0.0
Anton Shestakov
av6 at dwimlabs.net
Sat Feb 4 13:27:42 UTC 2023
04.02.2023 14:56, Uwe Brauer пишет:
>
>> 03.02.2023 00:34, Uwe Brauer пишет:
>
>> By "this" do you mean "branch:topic" or "branch//topic"?
>
> I meant "branch//topic"
>
> So can I switch the new namespace feature of, if I don't like it?
That depends on what you think "the new namespace feature" is. If you
don't want to use topic namespaces, then you don't have to. There's a
default namespace that will not be shown (similar to default branch or
empty topic).
On the other hand, if you want to forever use "branch:topic" format that
was never intended to be usable (e.g. hg up "branch:topic" doesn't
necessarily do what you expect), then you can use old versions of evolve
and topic.
>> What version of evolve do you have?
>
> I think it is 10.1. It has been quite some time I installed it, and I
> don't recall whether I did it by pip or compiled it myself.
>
> Eye balling the help, I can find a command to determine evolve's version
It's `hg version -v` and no, 10.1.0 definitely didn't have any topic
namespaces. The new "branch//namespace/topic" format at the moment is
only used in current default branch of evolve, which is not yet
released, but will be a part of the upcoming release candidate (i.e. rc
of 11.0.0). Also 10.1.0 is nowhere near "the current evolve version",
it's from 2+ years ago, topic namespaces were still only in the plans.
But the old "branch:topic" format was used in certain places like `hg
branches`, where it shouldn't be. This will likely change in the future,
since the UI part of topic namespaces feature is still being worked on.
More information about the Mercurial-devel
mailing list