No emails from foss.heptapod.net

[Georges Racinet]

On 08/02/2025 18:29, Antonio Muci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for hijacking this thread, but it feels that something relevant 
> happened right around the time this short discussion happened, and I 
> wanted to ask if there is any relation.
>
> This email thread is from January, 15th. Since January, 16th, the 
> hyperlinks contained in the email Heptapod sends out are no longer 
> direct links, but are wrapped in a tracking service.
>
> For example, instead of:
> https://foss.heptapod.net/mercurial/mercurial-devel/-/pipelines/97137
>
> Heptapod now sends:
> https://hgaigfa.r.af.d.sendibt2.com/tr/cl/kml_gIG4w4iPJMEkNdiG9NBdPn5rqerPYXrvVGRDIH2jXnGmwV_gmjlcfoSO0oN8VRt_UC5neVlQUVVF5m4jo0JqRXfXv7diPoGGuy9DRIZ5_KwhURXTjfLlt5BSTgm7yRKWwaRmC4Te-d_p7o7aG9uV8_St_zzwQFyPlJeg_BiN37pw1clL0B18GwrQboRFFDzWYpjlfNkIN-4sfkBQfNEyVS-ju_BdAZhCvvVmtirluNM_iUxE-DSeQIfv3Lhi9ppJeZKc9S9Jv7zlva_pfFP4SDW4jZ2uy7OAEQYeCNwBQNzoVlIWP-Wuy4O6O3dvhCBP-1m2UGX30DDVjOYXbTui56bGCtKZ 
>
>
> I understand that Heptapod is a product by a for-profit company (it 
> used to be Octobus; is it Orbeet nowadays?),
It is Orbeet, yes. That being said foss.h.n is not a commercial product.
> which has every right to take business-related decisions. However, I 
> find the use of an email link tracking service unsettling, and I 
> wanted to kindly ask if this change was discussed/announced somewhere.
>
> Was the outage (not a problem per-se) a consequence of this 
> modification? If so, a more direct language in the response would have 
> been appreciated

No, it's the other way round : the outage was due to our previous mail 
account expiring, part of a long story about a French provider that 
would put us too far for this thread.

I've seen the new links, I don't like them either (and certainly make no 
use of the corresponding tracking). It is simply a consequence of having 
switched to Clever Cloud's standard provider for sending emails. Of 
course I noticed only after the fact, and then, well, I'd already moved 
on to the next pressing issue.

The subject is not completely closed however : we did not yet reinstate 
a proper mailbox for incoming email. Perhaps we'll be able to fix that 
when we do.

Best,


> .
>
> Thank you
> Antonio
>
>
> On 15/01/25 14:18, Georges Racinet wrote:
>> On 15/01/2025 14:17, PIERRE AUGIER wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Since few days, I do not receive emails from foss.heptapod.net. I 
>>> saw that it affects at least another user 
>>> https://foss.heptapod.net/heptapod/foss.heptapod.net/-/issues/461
>>>
>>> Are there people who continue to receive emails from foss.heptapod.net?
>>>
>>> George, are you aware of this issue?
>>
>> Yes, we're working on it.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mercurial-devel mailing list
>> Mercurial-devel at lists.mercurial-scm.org
>> https://lists.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel


-- 
Georges Racinet
https://cloudcrane.io, https://heptapod.net
GPG: https://heptapod.net/pages/keys.html#georges-racinet

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0xB8EB20361976F291.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 677 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP public key
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20250208/259af6b7/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 236 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/attachments/20250208/259af6b7/attachment.sig>