GSoC Proposal Analysis/Brain Dump
Augie Fackler
durin42 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 14 14:33:40 UTC 2010
(-cc list, +list)
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Benoit Boissinot <bboissin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 04:59:45PM -0500, Augie Fackler wrote:
>> I've assigned mentors to the four projects with positive scores. We
>> can rehash who's mentoring what later, this just shows which ones we
>> feel are priorities. Don't feel just because you are/aren't assigned
>> someone it has to be that way. I did, however, try to go with the
>> notion we discussed at the sprint of explicitly assigning mentors
>> that are not domain experts to each student.
>
> We got 4 slots.
>
> Is there discussion needed on the 4 accepted students?
>
> Currently they rank in the following way:
> 1 Improved Changeset Discovery Mark Determann
> 2 hgwebdir rewrite Alexandru Totolici
> 3 Narrow Cloning Rafael Goncalves Martins
> 4 Porting Mercurial to Python 3 Renato Cunha
> 5 Parent Delta Pradeepkumar Gayam
> 5 Shallow Cloning in Mercurial Vishakh Harikumar
> (the others are negative)
I'm not _personally_ a fan of Py3k, but I'll defer to the judgement of
others, especially since it seems like parent delta and narrow cloning
might step on each other a little.
>
> Benoit
>
> (do we have a dedicated mailing list for this?)
>
>
> --
> :wq
>
More information about the Mercurial-gsoc
mailing list