GSoC Proposal Analysis/Brain Dump

[Matt Mackall]

On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 07:11 +0200, Peter Arrenbrecht wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Benoit Boissinot <bboissin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Bastian Doetsch
> > <bastian.doetsch at gmx.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 19.04.2010 um 18:31 schrieb Benoit Boissinot:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Benoit Boissinot <bboissin at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Augie Fackler <durin42 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> Is there discussion needed on the 4 accepted students?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Currently they rank in the following way:
> >>>>>> 1       Improved Changeset Discovery    Mark Determann
> >>>>>> 2       hgwebdir rewrite                Alexandru Totolici
> >>>>>> 3       Narrow Cloning                  Rafael Goncalves Martins
> >>>>>> 4       Porting Mercurial to Python 3   Renato Cunha
> >>>>>> 5       Parent Delta                    Pradeepkumar Gayam
> >>>>>> 5       Shallow Cloning in Mercurial    Vishakh Harikumar
> >>>>>> (the others are negative)
> >>>>>
> >
> > With two potential duplicates, it is best to assign mentors to parent
> > delta and shallow cloning.
> > Augie is in the process of contacting the other org to resolve the duplication.
> 
> Do we really want to take on students just to fill the slots, even if
> we're not really convinced by them?

Not really. Next year, we need to make an effort to find more potential
projects and students.

-- 
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux