GSoC Proposal Analysis/Brain Dump

[Brodie Rao]

On Apr 20, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Augie Fackler wrote:

> That's a side effect of the duplication detection run. It's back to the same state as yesterday now.
> 
> Should we take just the py3k student and give the other three slots back? Or pick up the shallow clones student as a potential risky option?

I'd like to see Peter's response to Vishakh's revised shallow cloning proposal and more feedback on the parent delta proposal.

It seems like both students actively participating with the community. If their proposals are too ambitious, perhaps they could be scaled back a bit?