GSoC Proposal Analysis/Brain Dump

[Peter Arrenbrecht]

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Brodie Rao <brodie at bitheap.org> wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Augie Fackler wrote:
>
>> That's a side effect of the duplication detection run. It's back to the same state as yesterday now.
>>
>> Should we take just the py3k student and give the other three slots back? Or pick up the shallow clones student as a potential risky option?
>
> I'd like to see Peter's response to Vishakh's revised shallow cloning proposal and more feedback on the parent delta proposal.

It looks much better this time. I'd say he has put a lot of effort
into the application by now. So, yes, why not risk it.
-parren