GSoC Proposal Analysis/Brain Dump

[Benoit Boissinot]

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Peter Arrenbrecht
<peter.arrenbrecht at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Brodie Rao <brodie at bitheap.org> wrote:
>> On Apr 20, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Augie Fackler wrote:
>>
>>> That's a side effect of the duplication detection run. It's back to the same state as yesterday now.
>>>
>>> Should we take just the py3k student and give the other three slots back? Or pick up the shallow clones student as a potential risky option?
>>
>> I'd like to see Peter's response to Vishakh's revised shallow cloning proposal and more feedback on the parent delta proposal.
>
> It looks much better this time. I'd say he has put a lot of effort
> into the application by now. So, yes, why not risk it.


The de-dup meeting is in a few hours. So far the following proposal
are marked as accepted:
- py3k
- narrow cloning
- parent delta

and we would give one slot back. I asked for it to be given to PSF
(where if we care we can chose between some projects: e.g. ipython,
pip, idle for interactive learning, reST editor, but unless someone
has a preference *and* replies shortly I said we didn't care).

If you disagree about anything, now would be a good time.

Benoit