Things we ought to do to improve our packaging

[Lee Cantey]

Indeed it was.  I was out of town until the 5th and one (for 10.8) of the
three OS X build machines I use was down.  I decided to wait until I could
push all three versions at once so there wouldn't be confusion.  I've
switched over to using mercurial.selenic.com for hosting and I believe my
automation is correct now.

My apologies for the delays,
Lee


On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Matt Mackall <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 21:52 -0500, Kevin Bullock wrote:
> > On 7 Aug 2013, at 5:35 PM, Matt Mackall wrote:
> >
> > > All of this is actually pretty low on my concern list about packaging
> > > which runs something like this:
> > >
> > > - OS X
> >
> > Which reminds me, OS X builds of 2.7 appeared out of nowhere on
> mercurial.selenic.com. I didn't build them. Who did?
>
> Probably Lee. He seems to be really busy, but I did manage to get in
> touch with him about a month ago.
>
> --
> Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial-devel mailing list
> Mercurial-devel at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-packaging/attachments/20130809/3dfd2c03/attachment-0002.html>