[Commented On] D10915: upgrade_utils: add support for enabling internal phases during upgrade

[marmoute (Pierre-Yves David)]

marmoute added a comment.


  In D10915#166894 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10915#166894>, @Mathiasdm wrote:
  
  > If obsolescence is enabled, the behaviour of 'strip' is not ideal. What users typically want is the behaviour of 'hg strip --soft', as the regular 'hg strip' makes older revisions visible again.
  
  Which is exactly the kind of behavior with `hg strip --soft` that will cause probleme with evolution :-D
  
  It looks like your users whats `hg prune`, do they not ?

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10915/new/

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10915

To: Mathiasdm, #hg-reviewers
Cc: marmoute, mercurial-patches
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-patches/attachments/20210628/1803ce23/attachment-0002.html>