[Updated] D10031: revlog-index: add `replace` method
marmoute (Pierre-Yves David)
phabricator at mercurial-scm.org
Wed Mar 3 13:54:51 UTC 2021
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
marmoute added inline comments.
marmoute requested changes to this revision.
INLINE COMMENTS
> revlog.c:519-536
> + data = self->added + self->hdrsize * (rev - self->length);
> + putbe32(offset_flags >> 32, data);
> + putbe32(offset_flags & 0xffffffffU, data + 4);
> + putbe32(comp_len, data + 8);
> + putbe32(uncomp_len, data + 12);
> + putbe32(base_rev, data + 16);
> + putbe32(link_rev, data + 20);
Should we explicitly check that no value other than the sidedata have been changed ?
> parsers.py:120-124
> + """
> + Replace an existing index entry with a new value. This should
> + not be used outside of the context of sidedata rewriting, inside the
> + transaction that creates the revision `i`.
> + """
The changeset description state that we don't check the transaction thing in the python version. I assume that this is because we have some extra information in the C code that the python version don't have. Could we fix it ?
> parsers.py:128-134
> + if i >= self._lgt:
> + self._extra[i - self._lgt] = _pack(self.index_format, *tup)
> + else:
> + index = self._calculate_index(i)
> + self._data[index : index + self.index_size] = _pack(
> + self.index_format, *tup
> + )
Same feedback as the C code, could we validate than we don't modify anything else than the side-data index ?
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10031/new/
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10031
To: Alphare, #hg-reviewers, marmoute
Cc: marmoute, mercurial-patches
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-patches/attachments/20210303/bbf36e49/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Mercurial-patches
mailing list