[Commented On] D12627: worker: adapt _blockingreader to work around a python3.8.[0-1] bug (issue6444)

[martinvonz (Martin von Zweigbergk)]

martinvonz added a comment.


  In D12627#193347 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12627#193347>, @mharbison72 wrote:
  
  > In D12627#193334 <https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12627#193334>, @martinvonz wrote:
  >
  >> I *think* you're supposed to open a "merge request" on https://foss.heptapod.net/mercurial/mercurial-devel these days. Right, @Alphare?
  >
  > I didn't think we made the switch yet, but I'm fine doing that as a pilot.  (I ended up amending a commit comment typo since the last push, so it will need to run CI again.)
  
  The reason I suggested it was that I queued the patch and tried to push it to hg-committed, but that failed and told me to create a merge request instead. So I suppose it's actually you who should create that merge request since it's your patch. I'm not sure I understood it correctly, though.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12627/new/

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12627

To: mharbison72, #hg-reviewers, mjacob
Cc: martinvonz, Alphare, mjacob, mercurial-patches
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-patches/attachments/20220518/8cbb6df4/attachment-0002.html>