[Reviewers] Review Tooling (was: dropped a couple changesets and flushed the queue)

[Augie Fackler]

> On Dec 28, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> 
> I've good hope to be able to suggest them as reviewer sometime in 2017 (eg: junw is on a good progress slope).

I had previously suggested granting review-but-not-accept privileges to indygreg and one other (might have been junw? I don’t remember) a while ago, and it got punted until the steering committee could vote on it.

Given how our other discussions have gone I wasn’t going to bring it up since it’s a policy change, and I’m weary of having policy discussions already. That said, the review tooling is cleaner than it used to be (Kevin and I paired on it for a day), and it should be feasible to add some testing and then add that as a feature. Should we call for a vote on the SC list, and plan to offer those permissions to those two as soon as the stack would support it?

Thanks,
Augie