[Reviewers] Review Tooling

[Augie Fackler]

> On Dec 28, 2016, at 11:34 AM, Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> 
>> Given how our other discussions have gone I wasn’t going to bring it up since it’s a policy change, and I’m weary of having policy discussions already. That said, the review tooling is cleaner than it used to be (Kevin and I paired on it for a day), and it should be feasible to add some testing and then add that as a feature. Should we call for a vote on the SC list, and plan to offer those permissions to those two as soon as the stack would support it?
> 
> I think it is two early for these two, (but that they are on a way to be ready for it.)

Do you object to me putting the question to a vote of the steering committee? It’s a policy change, so I wasn’t going to bring it up until we work out the constant naming thing and what we mean by policy changes waiting until next October.