[Reviewers] Proposal for new patchwork state

[Augie Fackler]

Sounds good to me. I can probably even get the robot to automatically set pre-reviewed in some cases.

> On Feb 23, 2016, at 4:57 AM, Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I would like to add two new state to patchwork
> 
> - Pre-Reviewed: for when non-reviewer have "lgtm" it but it still need someone to look at it
> - Need-second-review: for when a reviewer looked at it, but a second pair of eyes have been requested?
> 
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> I'll probably delete the "awaiting Upstream" in the process
> 
> --
> Pierre-Yves David
> _______________________________________________
> Reviewers mailing list
> Reviewers at mercurial-scm.org
> https://mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/reviewers

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-reviewers/attachments/20160223/17ed39de/attachment.asc>