[Reviewers] Experimental extension criteria

[Pierre-Yves David]

On 02/25/2016 01:06 AM, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
> Perhaps an alternative would be to develop these experimental extensions
> in forks/branches of hg core? That would address the "Easier to
> contribute (same process and testing as the rest of the core work)."
> item. Has that been considered?

It seems like you have broken out of the criteria section ;-).

I'm not too concerned about the "possible drawback" section for now. 
There is multiple extensions that are used only by Facebook/Google (and 
therefore don't car about release cycle) and that are mature enough to 
not see major amount of code update yet (mostly on Facebook side). So 
I'm trying to move forward with the less contrainted one.

Should I read the fact your break out of the criteria section without 
comment as "You have no complains/improvement idea" about the criteria.

If so, when can we expect narrow to drop there :)

-- 
Pierre-Yves David