[Reviewers] Changing the name of "reviewers" group and repository

[Martin von Zweigbergk]

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:54 PM Pierre-Yves David <
pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 03/10/2016 10:38 PM, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
> > "pusher" makes sense, but note that it (informally) means "a person who
> > sells illegal drugs" (also reminds me of
> > http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117407/).
>
> Gah, slang…
>
> > Does it make sense to call us "maintainers"?
>
> This is currently used for a smaller group. And It think it make sense
> to keep the "ability to push draft patch", and "responsability to
> maintain" Mercurial separated to put extra burden of people who get the
> commit bits.
>
> We currently have multiple groups:
>
> "Matt":
>    contains: Matt Mackall
>    can: access to the publishing repository, can make release
>

Will Matt retain this role? IIUC, some council (but not the one below?)
would pick a person every week who would be the one publishing changes.
(This question is probably unrelated to your question, but I'd still like
to know.)


> "Mercurial Council":
>    contains: Benoit Boissinot, Matt Mackall, Dirkjan Ochtman
>    can: decide how to spend Project money SFC side (iirc)
> "Co-maintainers":
>    contains: Pierre-Yves David, Augie Fackler, Matt Mackall
>    can: gather regularly and try to plan the future,
> "Reviewers":
>    contains:
>    * Pierre-Yves David
>    * Augie Fackler
>    * Matt Mackall
>    * Yuya Nishihara
>    * Bryan O'Sullivan
>    * Martin von Zweigbergk
>    can: Push the clowncopter and repo/reviewers
> "Crew" (deprecated in practice):
>    contains: list here https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/CrewRepository
>    can: Push to crew
> "Contributors""
>    contains: all
>    can: send and review patches on the list.
>
> --
> Pierre-Yves David
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-reviewers/attachments/20160310/6a8fc136/attachment-0002.html>