[Reviewers] How to handle Phabricator patches in Patchwork

[Sean Farley]

Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz at google.com> writes:

> I think we can just mark Phabricator patches as "not applicable". That
> means you have to check both Phabricator and Patchwork to see what
> needs to be reviewed, but that still seems like less work than
> manually keeping Patchwork up to date. Agree? Augie said he can script
> it if we agree.

Yeah, I guess that makes sense. I'm doing a bit of work on some of
patchwork (locally) that is partially upstreamed. I might be able to
upstream some of Augie's work, too. Just a thought / suggestion.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 800 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-reviewers/attachments/20170713/12ca486a/attachment.asc>