[Reviewers] 4.3 delayed: should we unfreeze on 8/1 anyway?
Augie Fackler
raf at durin42.com
Mon Jul 31 17:09:32 UTC 2017
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 12:36, Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jul 31, 2017, at 08:13, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote:
>>
>> We need to hold 4.3 for a few days (possibly a week?) because of some security fixes and coordinating with other tools.
>>
>> Should we unfreeze default on the first anyway, and cut the 4.3 release from stable once we've got the all-clear?
>
> Since we're actively trying to lower contribution friction and since freezes are harmful to that goal, my vote is to unfreeze as planned.
Works for me.
If anyone else has opinions (especially dissenting ones), please speak up today. Thanks!
More information about the Reviewers
mailing list