Very nice program. Comments and usage questions...

[Marc Singer]

On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 11:10:26PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 07:34:32PM -0700, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > >   o Why not have 'hg move' record that a move happened *and* move the
> > >     file?
> > 
> > It would not be symmetrical with 'add' and 'remove'.
> 
> Would you accept a patch which makes "hg mv" and "hg cp" syntactic
> sugar for "cp foo bar; hg copy foo bar" and "mv foo bar; hg move foo bar"?

Is there ever a reason to want hg copy foo bar without the file copy?
Or with hg move?  I ask because I've been using SVN for at least half
a year and never wanted the functions separated.