[BUG?] Experimenting problems during an Arch->Mercurial repo conversion
Edouard Gomez
ed.gomez at free.fr
Wed Jul 27 05:28:53 UTC 2005
Matt Mackall (mpm at selenic.com) wrote:
> Mercurial will indeed miss changes where the file size _and_ time don't
> change. And the stat interfaces it's using are currently at 1s
> granularity.
>
> In general, not all filesystems support sub-second granularity.
> Critically, if you want it on ext3, I believe you need to reformat
> your drive to use 256 byte inodes rather than the default 128.
Well the sub second case, as i said, is probably not the problem as baz
is not known for being very very fast. Applying a changeset in baz
implies quite a lot of operations, getting the tarball, inflate it,
parse a fair amount of inodes, patch...
> So with import scripts, you probably want to pass a list of file names
> to commit instead of relying on both the filesystem and Mercurial to
> get it right.
Well, this is the more easy path.
> Patches changing the dirstate code to use os.stat_float_times() will
> be accepted, of course, but it's not a complete fix because of the
> spotty support in the filesystems themselves.
If i wasn't a Python ignorant, i would do :-) as mercurial is so fast,
it would make sense to allow its commit to catch in such scenarios.
Anyway, thanks for the help, i'll commit a list of files. It's more
reliable for an import script.
--
Edouard Gomez
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list