python2.2: worth supporting?

Matt Mackall mpm at selenic.com
Tue Jun 14 03:12:27 UTC 2005


On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 07:58:13PM -0700, Arun Sharma wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:25:47AM -0700, Arun Sharma wrote:
> >
> >>On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:53:01PM +0200, Thomas Arendsen Hein wrote:
> >>
> >>>* Arun Sharma <arun at sharma-home.net> [20050609 22:46]:
> >>>
> >>>>I tried to run hg on a python2.2 based system today and it didn't work.
> >>>>I have a patch that makes it compile and takes care of "yield".
> >>>>
> >>>>But there are other issues due to which it doesn't work.
> >>>
> >>>Did you see my patch in the list archive?
> >>>http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/2005-May/000051.html
> >>
> >>Updated patch. I had to fix mpatch.c and fix up the rejects.
> >
> >
> >How well is this working at this point?
> 
> Well enough to checkout source and update. But commit is not working 
> (tempfile.mkstemp not available on 2.2).

Well when you think it's reasonably close, bring it to my attention
again. If we can keep it from being intrusive in the main code, it's
probably a reasonable thing to do.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.



More information about the Mercurial mailing list