Mercurial vs Updated git HOWTO for kernel hackers
Kyle Moffett
mrmacman_g4 at mac.com
Wed Jun 29 03:53:47 UTC 2005
On Jun 28, 2005, at 20:25:02, Sean wrote:
> there will be a price to pay if the linux community fragments over
> choice
> of scm.
I don't agree. With the current set of SCMs, I don't think it will
be long
before somebody invents a gitweb/Mercurial/whatever gateway, such
that I can
"hg serve" from my Mercurial repository and have Linus "git pull" from a
multiprotocol bridge.
> the good news is that we're no longer locked into the whims of
> some proprietary system. so it should be straight forward for
> those who
> choose any tool to work with those who've chosen another. this is
> already
> evidenced by the fact that the git repository is pulled and re-
> exeported
> with mecurial.
I agree completely! Cheers to the end of proprietary revision storage!
> anyway, all the best, just wish you guys would spend less time
> trying to
> convert git users and more time advancing your own tool.
A project with no users isn't much of a project, now is it? In any
case,
this thread has long since passed its usefulness, so let's let it
die, ok?
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
--
I lost interest in "blade servers" when I found they didn't throw
knives at people who weren't supposed to be in your machine room.
-- Anthony de Boer
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list