[patch] update mq to work with "current" hg

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Theodore Ts'o wrote:

>Ditto.  I also find the strip functionality to be useful, and have
>been currently torn betewen using the version of hg in Chris's mq
>repository, versus the new toys/features in the latest hg
>repository.... for the moment I've stuck with using the hg in Chris's
>mq repository, which means I'm not testing hg mainline.  
>
>So there are some downsides to not merging mq, or at least the changes
>to hg such as strip which are needed to support mq.
>  
>

Yes, I'm in the same position. I do more or less 100% of my work with mq
these days. In my world mq is synonymous with mercurial, and a release
without mq would be incomplete. (That's not to say that I think mq is a
required 1.0 feature, but I would probably be using 1.0+mq.)

J