question about next 0.8 release and mq

[Matt Mackall]

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 08:33:23PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 January 2006 20:09, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 12:03:14PM -1000, Eric Firing wrote:
> > >>I'm curious: when do you expect to release 0.8 (or 0.7.x)?
> > >
> > > 0.8 should happen soonish. Too much Real Life going on right now, but
> > > I'll try to cut a release in the next couple weeks.
> >
> > Will the mq extension work with the core mercurial 0.8 (ie with no patch
> > to the mercurial sources) ?
> 
> Not right now.  hg is still missing the nested-trans patch, which is a nice 
> optimization but not crucial, and the nested locking code.  The locking fix 
> is more important, but IMHO we need to get that out of the way for 0.8 
> anyway.
> 
> Matt, can I talk you into the lock nesting or do we need to make a few __funcs 
> that don't lock?

I think I preferred the __foo approach when I last looked at this. But
you might want to resend your original patch so I can remember why.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.