Metadata
Thomas Arendsen Hein
thomas at intevation.de
Wed Mar 22 17:50:06 UTC 2006
* Bryan O'Sullivan <bos at serpentine.com> [20060322 18:22]:
> On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 18:21 +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > > Why should the revision control system care what kind of
> > > file you're dealing with?
> >
> > Because it's the one that distributes the files between users, and if it
> > doesn't store the file type then the users would have to communicate
> > this information by other means (email, IRC, web-page, ...) and that
> > would be tedious and error-prone.
>
> I must still be missing something. Users have to use some external
> method to tell what type a file is today, because most filesystems don't
> associate type information with files. Even MacOS has been distancing
> itself from typed files for years now.
>
> So if I'm using any SCM that I know of, I'm going to be looking at the
> file name and extension, the output of "file myfile.name", or the file
> contents to tell me what type the file is. Even if the SCM did store
> that information, what would you do with it?
I think we just found the main difference between SCM and CMS.
Thomas
--
Email: thomas at intevation.de
http://intevation.de/~thomas/
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list