bug: qpush loses loses file executable permissions
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Tue Nov 7 18:58:37 UTC 2006
On Monday 06 November 2006 5:38 am, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2006-11-05 17:31, Rob Landley <rob at landley.net> wrote:
> >On Thursday 02 November 2006 8:52 pm, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >> A third option would be to extend GNU patch(1), making it able to
> >> automatically grok and properly handle git-format patches, and submit
> >> this to the GNU patch developers.
> >
> > Or the busybox patch developers, since we have our own (independent)
> > codebase and we actually respond to users without insisting you say
> > GNU/ or bring us a shrubbery.
>
> I don't know what "busybox patch" is, I'm afraid. Is it a patch(1)
> implementation?
Yup. BusyBox has its own implementation of most commands. (If it just glued
together the existing implementations, it wouldn't be smaller.)
Rob
--
"Perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but
when there is no longer anything to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list