On Mercurial API

[Brendan Cully]

On Wednesday, 01 August 2007 at 08:49, Bela Babik wrote:
> > At then end of the day, looking at Git stable,
> > flexible and well-documented command line interface makes it more
> > appealing than Mercurial in the perspective of writing extensions.
> 
> Git is stable Mercurial isn't.

Do you mean you've actually written extensions in git and mercurial
and found the process to be easier with git? If so, some comments on
the issues you encountered could be productive.

Or is this a purely theoretical argument?