Mercurial 0.9.4 released!

[TK Soh]

On 6/26/07, David Frey <dpfrey at shaw.ca> wrote:
> While I was viewing
> http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/BinaryPackages  I
> noticed that previous versions of Mercurial for windows have been posted
> at http://mercurial.berkwood.com/
>
> Should the versions posted by Dongsheng Song be considered unofficial?  I
> have had success with the binaries provided by the berkwood site, so I
> am hesitant to change, but I want to try out 0.9.4.

Lee Cantey has been the 'official' supplier for the win32 binary. If
you have been using Lee's binary. It's probably safer to wait for the
0.9.4 packaged by Lee. Same idea applies to berkwood or other
distributions.