Mercurial vs. Bazaar speedtest clone and log - update: hg 1.1 vs. bzr 1.10

Arne Babenhauserheide arne_bab at web.de
Mon Dec 15 23:16:26 UTC 2008


Am Dienstag 16 Dezember 2008 00:09:16 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Montag 15 Dezember 2008 23:29:42 schrieb Matt Nordhoff:
> > That bug isn't relevant. It's about using the bzrlib api directly. When
> > just running "bzr" from the command line, it should always set up
> > logging.
>
> Yet it doesn't - that might be one of the reasons why 1.10 isn't stable in
> Gentoo, yet.
>
> > (Well, "time bzr init-repo --rich-root-pack bzr")
> >
> > By the way, using "--1.9-rich-root" instead of "--rich-root-pack" will
> > give better performance. It would be interesting to see what the
> > difference is, if you don't mind running the tests yet again. :-)

<snip>

> That's 17 seconds, far from the 2-4 seconds it gained with the --rich-root-
> pack setting.

I got careless... and forgot the hardlink option. 

$ time bzr branch python-bzr-trunk/ python-bzr-trunk2 --hardlink
No handlers could be found for logger "bzr"
[17731] 2008-12-16 00:15:23.572 INFO: Branched 40775 revision(s).
Branched 40775 revision(s).

real    0m4.828s
user    0m3.455s
sys     0m0.693s


This is about the same speed as the --rich-root-pack setting. 

Best wishes, 
Arne
-- 
-- My stuff: http://draketo.de - stories, songs, poems, programs and stuff :)
-- Infinite Hands: http://infinite-hands.draketo.de - singing a part of the 
history of free software.
-- Ein Würfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saubere (Rollenspiel-) Regeln.

-- PGP/GnuPG: http://draketo.de/inhalt/ich/pubkey.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20081216/371218df/attachment-0001.asc>


More information about the Mercurial mailing list