git 1.6 compared to hg 1.1 ?

[Leslie P. Polzer]

> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Thomas Burdick
> <thomas.burdick at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> how do these two compare in speed these days? most of the comparisons
>> I've seen are almost a year old now.
>
> I bet you asked the same in the git mailing list ;-P
>
> Git is, in general, faster than Mercurial.

I cannot confirm this. I didn't do any benchmarks but I'm currently
working regularly with hg and git repositories and esp. diffing feels
a lot faster with hg.

git thrashes my disk a lot.

  Leslie

-- 
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/polzer
Xing Profile: https://www.xing.com/profile/LeslieP_Polzer
Blog: http://blog.viridian-project.de/