git 1.6 compared to hg 1.1 ?

Alpár Jüttner alpar at cs.elte.hu
Mon Dec 29 14:42:42 UTC 2008

Previous message (by thread): git 1.6 compared to hg 1.1 ?
Next message (by thread): git 1.6 compared to hg 1.1 ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Results: 
> 
> init:
> - git: 0.217 ± 0.445

Hmm... Then git is _very_ fast in some cases, indeed. :)

Alpar

Previous message (by thread): git 1.6 compared to hg 1.1 ?
Next message (by thread): git 1.6 compared to hg 1.1 ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Mercurial mailing list