hg export usage: Why not default = changes to remote?
Brendan Cully
brendan at kublai.com
Mon Dec 29 20:11:49 UTC 2008
On Monday, 29 December 2008 at 20:30, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why doesn't hg export without revisions default to exporting the changes to
> the remote repository?
>
> (I just saw that the workflow in the Python DVCS PEP requires one more step
> than the one in git and I couldn't find a reason for that - normally people
> will call outgoing and then select all changes for export
> - Python DVCS PEP: http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dg7fctr4_40dvjkdg64
> ).
It ought to be pretty easy to add an --outgoing <repo> flag to
export. Note that hg email already has a -o flag to do exactly
this, and the rdiff extension provides a workflow very similar to the
git example. (The git example folds all changes into one patch,
whereas the others preserve local history).
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list