1.0 approaches
Matt Mackall
mpm at selenic.com
Mon Mar 10 00:28:47 UTC 2008
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 10:04 +0100, Mathieu Clabaut wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Simon Cusack
> <scusack at fastmail.com.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:07:07 +0100
> "Mathieu Clabaut" <mathieu.clabaut at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Matt Mackall
> <mpm at selenic.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 06:36:29PM -0500, Leo Razoumov
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am drooling in excitement:-) That magic
> "approximately a
> > > > month" is about to elapse any time now.
> > >
> > > It's now looking more like a week, put off largely by my
> laptop
> > > dying. Let's call it next Friday.
>
>
> > http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue438will
>
>
> Just my 2 cents but
> http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue995 is a....
> +1.
>
> Does a consolidated lists of issues that are considered as "must be
> fixed before 1.0" exist somewhere ?
The list is basically "anything that broke since 0.9.5" because "0.9.5
and a couple releases before it were good enough to be called 1.0".
We've already spent too much time polishing, it's time to declare it
ready to use.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list