Question about pretxnchangegroup

[Dennis Brakhane]

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Maxim Vuets <maxim.vuets at gmail.com> wrote:
> You can make autobuild daemon and some kind of FIFO.
> 1. Developer clones shared, does changes, commits them to gate
> 2. Gate's hook passes last-known-working-rev (current state) and
> expected-tip-rev (commited changes) to autobuild daemon's FIFO.
> 3. Daemon performs in background build, testing and
> a) pushes changes from gate to shared in case of succeess
> (hg push --rev may be used also), or
> b) strip commited changes in case of failure.

Wouldn't that result in completely different changesets (rev.
numbers), and therefore
I an lot of merges once a developer pulls from shared?