Any way to relate repos w/o cloning?

[Chris Stromberger]

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Andrei Vermel <avermel at mail.ru> wrote:

>
> > Yes, but if I do the pull without doing an update, shouldn't
> > hg st report the updates that would occur in the working dir
> > when I do an update?
> >
> > Does it have something to do with the multiple heads??
> > Here's the output from hg heads:
> >
> > changeset:   1:ec46614b071e
> > tag:         tip
> > parent:      -1:000000000000
> > user:        cstromberger
> > date:        Thu Nov 13 07:13:24 2008 -0800
> > summary:     Initial import
> >
> > changeset:   0:cc98724a0a7a
> > user:        cstromberger
> > date:        Thu Nov 13 08:11:06 2008 -0800
> > summary:     Initial import
>
> I don't think you want the 2 heads. If you remove your .hg, copy .hg from
> the other machine and do 'hg stat', then you'll see your modified files.
> Otherwise your repo will contain 2 useless copies of every file polluting
> the history and wasting space.
>
> Andrei
>
>
Sounds good, thanks for all the info everyone.  Going to try this today and
see how it goes...

-Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20081113/c2cb719c/attachment-0002.html>