AW: Named branches
Adrian Buehlmann
adrian at cadifra.com
Fri Oct 17 14:42:41 UTC 2008
On 17.10.2008 16:12, Kauker, Hubert wrote:
> It is unfortunate that nothing is said what happens when -U is NOT used.
> In fact (tell me if I am wrong):
>
> The destination working directory is automatically updated to the
> head of the default branch, except when -U is used.
Yep. Something like that would be a good addition indeed.
> That update even happens when the source working directory is null.
> To me that certainly is *not* intuitive.
Only committed info is transferred around. Once you get used to
that notion, it will be intuitive soon.
> Now, I am not advocating to amend the help text.
But I do.
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list