Named branches

John D. Mitchell jdmitchell at gmail.com
Fri Oct 17 15:12:24 UTC 2008


FWLIW, this morass is a good example of why I do *not* like supporting  
the mix of full clones and these internal, "named branches". It's a  
confusing mess that adds no fundamental value.

IMHO, the better model is that the base only supports full clones and  
on top of that supports nested "forests" of repos cleanly.

Alas,
John




More information about the Mercurial mailing list