inactive branches? (simple question)
Matt Mackall
mpm at selenic.com
Tue Aug 17 13:55:55 UTC 2010
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:49 +0200, Martin Geisler wrote:
> Neal Becker <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > hg branches
> > test11 21:3269769d1cf6
> > constrained_value 19:77cd62e886f3 (inactive)
> > vector 17:e35e7ce4d791 (inactive)
> > traits 15:1a8365415e86 (inactive)
> > multiarray 13:9e88a14b2b8f (inactive)
> > mersenne 11:d8e0b3807029 (inactive)
> > BUILD 9:2f786d2ec31d (inactive)
> > user-config 7:4cd7e52c8046 (inactive)
> > hgignore 5:2ad1a7301aa9 (inactive)
> > default 3:aa67a6883458 (inactive)
> >
> > What does 'inactive' mean?
>
> I've updated our glossary with this text:
>
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Martin Geisler <mg at lazybytes.net>
> # Date 1282046377 -7200
> # Branch stable
> # Node ID 528ff7610cbac3585358bad659e74a6aee9eafbf
> # Parent 2be70ca1731165935aaf751c60f161655c87a7f5
> glossary: add entry for "Branch, inactive"
>
> diff --git a/mercurial/help/glossary.txt b/mercurial/help/glossary.txt
> --- a/mercurial/help/glossary.txt
> +++ b/mercurial/help/glossary.txt
> @@ -42,6 +42,17 @@
> Branch head
> See 'Head, branch'.
>
> +Branch, inactive
> + If a named branch has no topological heads, it is considered to be
> + inactive. As an example, a feature branch becomes inactive when it
> + is merged into the default branch. The :hg:`branches` command
> + shows inactive branches by default, though they can be hidden with
> + :hg:`branches --active`.
> +
> + NOTE: this concept is deprecated because it is too implicit.
> + Branches show now be explicitly closed using :hg:`commit
'should'
> + --close-branch` when they are no longer needed.
> +
>
> See 'hg help glossary' in the next stable release.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
More information about the Mercurial
mailing list