CVS Migration Branches are not migrated

Diego Oliveira lokimad at gmail.com
Sun May 30 14:30:17 UTC 2010


Hello Heimi,

    The CVS branch conversion is a know problem using the mercurial
extension. The cvsps mechanism that fetches the repository history don't
give all information that one needs to make the accuracy conversion. I been
there, and needed to use the cvs2svn(also for mercurial, not only
subversion) direct in the CVSROOT repository and I got everything OK. Take a
look at http://vc.gerg.ca/hg/cvs2svn, a repository with the functionality I
told.



On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 6:20 AM, heimi <andreas.heidrich at gmail.com> wrote:

> I did a CVS to Hg convert yesterday. When I check the results, the
> number of revisions of a specific file is matching the number in the
> CVS repo, but most of the Branches are missing.
>
> I have some .project Files that have 4 branch tags in CVS but 0 in the
> resulting Hg Repository. In other files some very old branches are
> migrated but most of the newer branches not. In general, I found no
> file with more then 1 branch.
>
> I did nothing special in the convert. I ckecked out a fresh workin dir
> with:
>   cvs -d /tkg/cvs/repository checkout NGCalculatorBackend
> Then I started a convert with
>  hg convert --time cvs/NGCalculatorBackend/ NGCalculatorBackend
> Do I miss something ? Is there a way to tell Hg to include all
> Branches ?
>
> Thanx for any input on this
> Andreas
> _______________________________________________
> Mercurial mailing list
> Mercurial at selenic.com
> http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/mercurial
>



-- 
Att.
Diego de Oliveira
System Architect
diego at diegooliveira.com
www.diegooliveira.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial/attachments/20100530/48b742ce/attachment.html>


More information about the Mercurial mailing list